More than 65% of new companies fail because they lack funding. In this course, you’ll learn common fundraising mistakes, how to nail an elevator pitch, how to craft a killer pitch deck, where to source investments from, and all about term sheets and convertible notes.
So you've recruited co-founders and promised them sweat equity and now you're saying they need to purchase that same equity? If that's the case, then shame on you for doing a bait and switch, and look out for law suits. If you've given out the equity and are cash poor, then you can ask for an infusion of cash from each owner, and if they cannot pony up their share of cash in proportion to their ownership in the company, they can see their shares go down while others who can put more in effectively 'purchase' the other owners shares. You'll need an attorney for this.
Perhaps I should have better clarified my earlier comment. We approached two people we wanted as part of our team. We offered them each an equity stake that would give them equal partnership in our firm. By law, the transfer of shares must be given in exchange for something. Enter the servuce agreement. We agree to give said equity in exchange for an agreed service. We also agreed that the work already performed would act as the sweat equity in exchange for the shares. The deal was completed and the papers signed. As we move forward, there are obvious costs associated with the tail end of R&D as well as a few minor corporate costs which we now all share equally. If the OP is referring to a single large ask from the new team members then that is different. If the ask is in reference to ongoing costs associated with getting the venture off the ground then why shouldn't they pay? As I mentioned earlier, every circumstance is different.