Startup Operations · AWS

Web hosting company recommendations?

Pradeep Subbarayan Head of Product Marketing, Amazon Publisher Direct,

September 21st, 2015

What are the best web hosting options for the first 1 or 2 years of a start up? Specifically, if we expect to have an email server and OTP verification services then I think the free AWS micro-instances may not work as we would higher RAM. Companies like Digital Ocean seem to charge $10 per month for 1GB of RAM. Are there better companies out there from a performance to cost ratio standpoint?
Thanks everyone.

Ashok Chavan Cofounder and CEO at ISeenLab Technology Private Limted (DomainRacer - Web Solution)

Last updated on May 15th, 2017

Hello everyone,

There are many best web hosting providers are out. It's all matter of requirements. But reliability and up-time is what matters in case web hosting with respect to it's cost.

You should not only go through popularity, but on the actual services, Storage and plans that they provided.

The best shared web hosting companies also offers:

  1. Easy to use and Reliable
  2. Good customer service, very professional
  3. Unlimited space and bandwidth.
  4. Support for multiple domains.

There are many best reliable & cheap web hosting provider, having a lot of hosting plans, it depends on your requirements and budget to select the most suitable one.I would recommend the Most Reliable yet Affordable Web Hosting Provider:

  • DomainRacer: Free SSL,SSD hosting with LiteSpeed 20x faster
  • BlueHost :HDD hosting with limited server resources
  • HostGator : HDD hosting with High cost

Above are the best and reliable and cheap web hosting companies. Hope it can help you!Thank you…

Steve Karmeinsky CoFounder City Meets Tech / Lean Capital Ltd / Placeholder Ltd

September 21st, 2015

You could try Softlayer. Rackspace, Media Temple etc


September 21st, 2015

Good question that alot of people have had. Here's one that is similar:
Always good to do a search before posting something new. Hope that helps.

Stan Podolski CEO at Nimble Aircraft.

September 21st, 2015

DO - best we have tried

MaxBlox/Founder Institute Director, Chennai Area at The Founder Institute

September 21st, 2015

We have used 1&1 for many years. It has international data centers, offers a lot of different server configurations and is one of the cheapest services around.

5 * Agents for a TV Channel Franchise

September 26th, 2015

If You want a large website with a lot of adaptability, I would recommend   How ever if you want something more specialised, with a login front page,and to be able to create private groups etc, then is better. 

Pradeep Subbarayan Head of Product Marketing, Amazon Publisher Direct,

September 27th, 2015

Thanks everyone. Still hard decision to make as I am not fully clear.

Hasan Diwan contract Data Scientist to several startups

September 27th, 2015

heroku or Openshift are the two go-to PAAS offerings.

If you need more flexibility, you can use AWS, Rackspace, or Azure.

Corey Butler Entrepreneur, Consultant, & Web/Data Engineer

September 27th, 2015

I've used alot of these services. My opinions are as follows:

512MB of RAM is barely enough to do anything useful other than static hosting.

For pure static hosting, use Github pages and RawGit (which has MaxCDN support). This is free. This has been fantastic... better than S3 in my opinion.

Amazon EC2 is overpriced. Same with Rackspace. Comparable performance between them.

DigitalOcean is OK, but Linode provides better performance per dollar. Vultr is a little cheaper, but you'll pay for it in maintenance/support.

I feel Softlayer has the best physical performance for the cost. My startup is in the IBM Global Entrepreneurship program, and we get a $1K/mo credit to split between SoftLayer and BlueMix (1yr). These machines are solid.

Azure is somewhere in between. It's alright, but overpriced. We're also in their BizSpark program, which gives you a $150/mo credit for 3yrs. The same kind of "hardware" can be acquired from DigitalOcean/Linode for about 40% less. But it could be enough for your needs. The Azure portal is kind of confusing though.

I use OpenShift for some lightweight stuff, but it is memory constrained and I've experienced alot of downtime over the last two years. I used to use Heroku, which is definitely more expensive for the same computing capacity.

I also used to run a small data center before the days of everything being on the cloud. When it boils down to it, you pay for the hardware and bandwidth. It's a commodity these days, but it's still a cost. The closer to the bare metal you get, the less you share the infrastructure... meaning higher costs.

Hope that helps.

Pradeep Subbarayan Head of Product Marketing, Amazon Publisher Direct,

September 27th, 2015

Thanks Corey. Helpful.