Entrepreneurship

What are some sneaky clauses that I should watch out for in offering documents?

sofia tabassum Attended Sarhad University of Science and Information Technology (NTI)

September 17th, 2016

This are the type of clause that investors that are not aligned with entrepreneurs like to introduce inside of offering documents. Some of these clauses may not mean anything today but down the line they could push you out of the company without a say in the matter.
A great idea is 1% of the work. Execution is the other 99%. In this course, we’ll teach you how to conduct market analysis, create an MVP and pivot (if needed), launch your business, survey customers, iterate your product/service based on feedback, and gain traction quickly.

Martin Omansky Independent Venture Capital & Private Equity Professional

September 17th, 2016

Offering documents are originated and drafted by "issuers" - that is to say "entrepreneurs" - and therefore entrepreneurs are in control of their phrases. It is not the offering document that is the source of "sneaky clauses", it is the text of the preferred stock agreement or the changes negotiated to the LLC operating agreement that could contain objectionable clauses. I advocate the use of an experienced securities lawyer to help with drafting and negotiating such documents. Also, most jurisdictions have enacted laws that protect shareholders from certain abuses, although I would still be careful. Sent from my iPhone

Michael Barnathan

September 17th, 2016

Investors demand certain rights for themselves when negotiating an investment, such as drag along rights, clawbacks, rights of refusal on a potential sale, liquidation preferences, and some others I'm not recalling offhand (last time I spoke to an investor was 2013; I've bootstrapped all of my ventures since a prior acquisition, so my knowledge may be a bit dated). Most deal with control over potential exits; they of course have an interest in this (you should too, since it's when your business actually becomes worth something). I've never seen an investor demand control over officer appointments except by virtue of the board seat(s) that many ask for. It isn't usually in their interest to kick a founder they invested in off of the team unless there are clear problems that the rest of the team is likely to recognize before the investor does.

Steve Simitzis Founder and CEO at Treat

September 17th, 2016

You should watch out for all of the clauses that you didn't have looked over by own attorney.

Suryanarayanan A Head, Incubator consulting services at Bhiveworkspace

September 18th, 2016

Though you should be careful of all the clauses. Sometimes giving the investors a long rope is sensible as they are putting their money on you and are at risk.
Of the lot I found liquidation preferences the most toxic in many agreements.

Neil Gordon Board Member, Corporate Finance Advisor and Strategy Consultant

September 18th, 2016

They're not "sneaky," they're right there in black and white. Investors want certain terms in exchange for their investment. If you don't like the terms, don't take their money.