I'm going to share a bit of our process...
1. Part of the challenge is for people to separate out their own values from those of the community. We addressed this by having everyone do a card sort for their own top 5 and bottom 5 values. In partners, people shared why they chose those values for themselves. Then we had them redo the sort with the group in mind - so what did they think the group should have as their shared values. We had all the values written on the wall and people put a dot for each of the 5 values they had selected.
2. We then had a discussion regarding the values that had the most dots and people shared why they thought those were important. For the values that only had a few dots, we also had people share why they had selected those. Through this dialogue we narrowed it down to the top 6 that the entire group was comfortable with.
3. Then in subteams, we worked on definitions for those values, using the definitions from the cards as a starting point but also incorporating language that people used during the conversation. We shared these definitions with the group and then a lead team took it as an action to get all the values written in a consistent form with a single voice.
4. Lastly, the lead team came up with guiding principles that describe what each value looks like in action. So, for example, the value of respect every person looks like **Every person's opinion matters so actively listen and respect each perspective**
All of this was presented back to the group for enhancements and the final work was approved by everyone.